Ashba v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. State · Buchanan v. State · Rodriguez v. State · Weaver v. State · Dowdy v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) A juror may be permitted to propound questions to a witness by subrait-ting them in writing to the judge, who will decide whether to submit the questions to the witness for answer, subject to the objections of the parties, which may be made at the time or at the next available opportunity when the jury is not present. Once the court has ruled upon the appropriateness of the written questions, it must then rule upon the objections, if any, of the parties prior to submission of the questions to the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burks v. State“gradually built up speed until it was traveling at approximately 70 miles per hour, all the while weaving to the center line and back to the fog line.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. SITTS“Another mode of inquiry could be for the trial court to instruct jurors to verbally or physically indicate if they have any questions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.