Record v. Record’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2023
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Manhart v. Manhart · Stansberry v. Stansberry · Catlett v. Catlett · Sun Oil Co. v. Hoke · Nu-Pro, Inc. v. GL Bartlett & Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“pursuant to 12 O.S. § 651 ¶16 Mother appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶17 "Motions for New Trial are directed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court's ruling thereon will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of that discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““We have long held, however, that where periodic payments are ordered, they are not owing and enforceable until they are each due. The right to enforce a periodic payment of ‘alimony or support ... accrues on each payment as it matures and the statute of limitations begins to run on each installment from the time fixed for its payment.’” (Citations omitted.).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.