Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 816 P.2d 206 - State v. Stores

State v. Stores’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Marsden v. State · 54 Wash. App. 585 - State v. Perencevic · 38 Wash. App. 484 - State v. Solis · Michael v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Its purpose is to help individuals reintegrate into society as constructive individuals as soon as they are able, without being confined for the full term of the sentence imposed.... The enforcement leverage that supports the parole conditions derives from the authority to return the parolee to prison to serve out the balance of his sentence if he fails to abide by the rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “According to these sources, a fair definition of the term “for a felony” is “in reference to” a crime that is punishable by more than one years’ imprisonment. This is a broad definition, which suggests that the statute was intended to cover a wide variety of cases and situations, including detentions for both felony convictions and felony charges![ 16 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[The legislature] intended [the statute] to apply to those who abscond from detention for a felony. It is a felony, whether the person is detained for a felony that has not yet been charged, or a felony that has been formally charged or for a felony on which a conviction has been entered![ 17 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.