Menzies v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Minnesota, v. Wayne Thomas Carter · 136 S. Ct. 709 - Musacchio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a group of individuals join together to plan and commit a crime, each member of the criminal plot is responsible for the acts of the others - regardless of whether a particular act was part of the original plan - as long as such acts were 'naturally or necessarily done' in the execution or furtherance of the common purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Our limited review ... leaves to the jury the resolution of conflicts in the testimony, the weight of the evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and reasonable inferences to be made from basic facts to ultimate facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.