Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

816 So. 2d 1174

Nelson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-05-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2002

1 state decisions

Relies on Pierre v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s motion for jail credit for time served prior to being placed on probation is affirmed.

¶2After revocation of probation,

[t]he court shall determine the amount of jail-time credit to be awarded for time served between the date of arrest as a violator and the date of recommitment, and shall direct the Department of Corrections to compute and apply credit for all other time served previously on the prior sentence for the offense for which the offender is being recommitted.

¶3§ 921.0017, Fla. Stat. (1997) (emphasis added).

¶4Appellant’s motion acknowledged that the trial court ordered credit for the time he spent in jail after violating probation until recommitment. If appellant has a dispute with the amount of credit for other time served, as calculated by the Depart-*1175merit, his remedy lies "with the Department, which has the authority to consider complaints concerning miscalculations of credit for time served. If he does not obtain such administrative relief, his remedy then is to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court located where he is incarcerated. See Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to his doing so.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/816/so2d/1174 · .json · Public domain