Burke v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Gee v. Gee · 394 So. 2d 41 - Lightell v. Lightell · Corcoran v. Corcoran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant is constitutionally amenable to a forum's specific jurisdiction if it possesses sufficient minimum contacts with the forum to satisfy due-process requirements and if the forum's exercise of jurisdiction comports with ' "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.