Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 816 So. 2d 694 - Nelson v. State

816 So. 2d 694 - Nelson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 735 So. 2d 1281 - Hoskins v. State · 788 So. 2d 223 - Atwater v. State · 698 So. 2d 522 - Correll v. State · 617 So. 2d 825 - Highsmith v. State · 770 So. 2d 195 - Odom v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This claim fails because “in order to set forth a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based upon counsel’s failure to call a witness, a post-conviction motion must allege that the witness was available to testify.” Nelson v. State, 816 So.2d 694, 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Also, prejudice is inadequately pled and is not established.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an explanation as to how the admission of this evidence prejudiced the outcome of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.