816 So. 2d 80 - Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2014
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Berkery v. Commissioner · Ex Parte Branch · In Re Atlantic Richfield Co. In Re Castillo Ponce and in Re Torres Herrera · Ramirez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Because the prosecutor stated his reasons for the questioned strikes, the issue whether [the defense] established ■á prima facie case of discriminatory use of peremptory challenges is moot. E.g., Hart v. State, 612 So.2d 520, 524 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 612 So.2d 536 (Ala.1992), cert. denied, 508 U-S. 953, 113 S.Ct. 2450 , 124 L.Ed.2d 666 (1993). If a par ty’s explanations fór its peremptory-challenges are -a 'part of the record, those explanations will be reviewed by the appellate courts regardless of the manher in which they came to be in the-record. E.g., Huntley v. State, 627 So.2d 1013, 1016 (Ala.1992); McLeod v. State, 581 So.2d 1144 (Ala.Cr.App.1990);””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirksey v. State“There is no requirement that a prosecutor establish evidentiary support for every strike in every case, especially where the defendant has not specifically questioned the validity of the prosecutor's explanations or demanded further proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. State“[C]omparable treatment of similarly situated jurors of both races tends to rebut any inference of discriminatory intent in the prosecutor's strikes against black jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.