Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 816 SW2D 773 - Theus v. State

Theus v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1994
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · David W. McKay v. Texas · Albrecht v. State · Johnson v. State · Jordan-Maier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant moves the Court to allow him to testify at the guilt stage of the trial free from impeachment by any and/or all of the prior convictions that the State has given notice of an intent to use for such purpose, for the following reasons: ****** The particularly unique facts surrounding the felony arson probation and subsequent revocation are such that the prejudicial value to the Defendant substantially outweighs its probative value as well. In addition, this conviction has virtually no bearing on truth and veracity either.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.