Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 816 SW2D 824 - State v. Pierce

State v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2012

15 state decisions

120199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. State · State v. Moreno · Beck v. State · State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Denson · Flores v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden is on the appellant, or other party seeking review, to see that a sufficient record is presented to show error requiring reversal.” In 1997 we adopted Rule 34, which covers the appellate record. The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.