Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

817 A.2d 196

In Re Smith

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2003

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2003-02-27

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2019

8 state decisions

Relies on Matter of Addams

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SCHWELB, Associate Judge,

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur in the judgment and join Judge Ferren’s carefully documented opinion. I *204note only, as I did in my separate opinion in In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 203-10 (D.C.1990) (en banc), that lawyers who have not misappropriated client funds, but who have nevertheless acted far more dishonorably than respondent Smith did, have received substantially more lenient discipline.

/817/a2d/196 · .json · Public domain