Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 817 A.2d 781 - Fink v. State

Fink v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
15
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber · Sanabria v. United States · Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both 11 Del. C. § 1109(4) and § 1111(1) use the term "visual depiction” in the singular. The clearest reading of the statutes is that each individual "visual depiction” of child pornography that is knowingly "dealt” or possessed by a defendant constitutes the basis for a separate offense under the statutes. Accordingly, in this case, [the defendant's] possession of multiple photographs depicting child pornography constituted multiple violations of both the dealing and the possession statute. Id. at 788.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Constitutional claims de novo to determine if the trial court committed an error of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “clear [evidence] that the sentencing judge relied on impermissible factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.