Fink v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
33 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber · Sanabria v. United States · Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both 11 Del. C. § 1109(4) and § 1111(1) use the term "visual depiction” in the singular. The clearest reading of the statutes is that each individual "visual depiction” of child pornography that is knowingly "dealt” or possessed by a defendant constitutes the basis for a separate offense under the statutes. Accordingly, in this case, [the defendant's] possession of multiple photographs depicting child pornography constituted multiple violations of both the dealing and the possession statute. Id. at 788.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Constitutional claims de novo to determine if the trial court committed an error of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. State“clear [evidence] that the sentencing judge relied on impermissible factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wescott v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.