817 F2d 102 Scarborough v. Ridley

817 F.2d 102
Unpublished Disposition

Priscilla SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dr. RIDLEY, Defendant-Appellee,
Anne Downes, Warden, Defendant.

No. 86-6824.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 29, 1987.
Decided April 22, 1987.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Priscilla Scarborough, appellant pro se.

Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods & Battle, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:


Advertisement
view counter
1

A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Scarborough v. Ridley, C/A No. 86-525-R (E.D.Va., Dec. 9, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.