Centeno v. Shultz’s Empirical Analysis
817 F.2d 1212 · 1987
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Roberto Saavedra Bruno, et al. v. Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of State, et al. (1999), Ahmed v. Department of Homeland Security (2003)
12 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1184 (§ 214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kleindienst v. Mandel · Lazaro Gonzalez-Cuevas and Amelia Valerio De Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Lazaro Gonzalez-Cuevas and Amelia Valerio De Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Te Kuei Liu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“decisions of United States consuls on visa matters are nonreviewable by the courts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Randall v. Meese
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.