¶1Otis Lee Fairley, pro se.
¶2Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.
¶3Before THORNBERRY, GEE, and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.
¶6The district court dismissed Otis Lee Fairley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 petition as barred by the statute of limitations. He appeals and we affirm.
¶7In September 1982, a Mississippi state court convicted the appellant of murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment. He was sent immediately to the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman. He sought and received an order from Justice Robertson of the Mississippi Supreme Court in May 1983 directing that he be returned to the Hinds County Detention Center during the pendency of his appeal as mandated by Miss.Code.Ann. § 99-19-41.1 Despite the order, the appellant re*307mained at Parchman. He filed the present action in December 1984.
¶8The district court applied the one-year statute of limitations to Fairley’s suit and accordingly dismissed it. See Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 106 S.Ct. 1378, 89 L.Ed.2d 603 (1986). Fairley argues that Gates should not be applied retroactively. As we explained in Young v. Biggers, 816 F.2d 216 (5th Cir.1987), we are bound to apply Gates retroactively. (Shelby v. McAdory, 781 F.2d 1053 (5th Cir.1986) requires that Gates be applied retroactively in § 1983 suit against law enforcement officials). Fairley’s action, therefore, was time-barred one year from the date when he knew or had reason to know of the injury that is the basis of his action. Justice Robertson issued the order directing Fairley’s transfer in May 1983. That is the relevant date for the purpose of the statute of limitations. Fairley filed this action in December 1984. Accordingly, it is untimely.
¶9AFFIRMED.
¶12dissenting:
¶13The present case is factually distinguishable from Shelby v. McAdory, 781 F.2d 1053 (5th Cir.1986), and Young v. Biggers, 816 F.2d 216 (5th Cir.1987). In those cases the actions arose prior to 1982 when we decided Morrell v. City of Picayune, 690 F.2d 469 (5th Cir.1982). In the Fairley case at hand the action arose in 1983.
¶14The significance of the Morrell date was its holding, for the first time by this court, that “the one-year statute governing actions for intentional torts by ordinary citizens does not apply to torts by police.” Id. at 470. The Morrell court applied a six-year limitation period. Fairley was entitled to rely on that precedent, and the analysis of Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 92 S.Ct. 349, 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), protected him from retroactivity of our change to the one-year limitation rule in Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985).
¶15Shelby failed to consider the Chevron test and was incorrectly decided. Now we extend the error despite the significant difference of fact.