Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 817 F.2d 507 - Koch v. Goldway

Koch v. Goldway’s Empirical Analysis

817 F.2d 507 · 1987

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Knievel v. ESPN (2005), Leidholdt v. L.F.P. Inc. (1988)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

16019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler · Siler v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · California ex rel. State Lands Commission v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the surrounding circumstances of a statement are those of a heated political debate, where certain remarks are necessarily understood as ridicule or vituperation, or both, but not as descriptive of factual matters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[b]ase and malignant speech is not necessarily actionable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is perhaps unfortunate that the legal category of opinion, which sounds, and often is, a dignified classification for the pursuit of honest and fair debate, must also be used to describe statements such as the one at issue here, which, in reality, is nothing more than a vicious slur.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.