Schlessinger v. Valspar Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 4301 (Truth in Savings Act) · 47 U.S.C. § 543
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“but similarly fails to provide any supporting authority. The Court declines to read a private right of action into Executive Law § 63. This law describes the Attorney General’s enforcement powers and solely contemplates enforcement actions by the Attorney General. Where, as here, a statute does not provide for an express private right of action, the courts will only imply one after considering:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'most critical' factor ... is whether such an action would create 'unwarranted interference with the legislative scheme.' ” Id. (citing Hudes v. Vytra Health Plans Long Island, 295 A.D.2d 788, 789 , 744 N.Y.S.2d 80 (N.Y.App.Div. 3d Dep't 2002)). The Court finds that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.