Lampitok v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(d) A conviction does not count for purposes of this section as a prior unrelated felony conviction if: [[Image here]] (3) all of the following apply: (A) The offense is an offense under IC 16-42-19 or IC 35-48-4. (B) The offense is not listed in seetion 2(b)(4) of this chapter. (C) The total number of unrelated convictions that the person has for: (i) dealing in or selling a legend drug under IC 16-42-19-27; (ii) dealing in cocaine or a narcotic drug (IC 35-48-4-1); (ii) dealing in a schedule I, II, III controlled substance (IC 35-48-4- 2), (iv) dealing in a schedule IV controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-8); and (v) dealing in a schedule V controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-4); does not exceed one (1).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Weiss v. State

2. “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. King v. State

3. “An information that enables an accused, the court, and the jury to determine the crime for which conviction is sought satisfies due process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dickenson v. State