Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 817 P.2d 744 - Hurt v. Noble

Hurt v. Noble’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Sapulpa · Estate of Heard · 84 Ill. App. 3d 151 - Wielert v. Larson · In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With Harrington · Smith v. Reinhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No adoption may be challenged on any ground either by a direct or collateral attack more than one (1) year after the entry of the final adoption decree regardless of whether the decree is void or voidable....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.