Rubman v. Honig’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 601 So. 2d 534 - Pimm v. Pimm · 465 So. 2d 581 - Taylor v. Kenco Chemical & Mfg. Corp. · 685 So. 2d 74 - Mastromonico v. Mastromonico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Her] `silence when it is [her] duty to speak,' should estop [her] from `asserting a right which [s]he otherwise would have had.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.