Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

817 So. 2d 1055

Tully v. Tully

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-06-06

Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee · 785 So. 2d 562 - Klette v. Klette · Mead v. Mead

Decided 2002-06-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1AFFIRMED. See Klette v. Klette, 785 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (“Appellant’s failure to provide either a transcript or proper substitute, such as a stipulated statement of the facts, defeats the appellate court’s ability to review either the factual or legal basis for the trial court’s decision.”); Mead v. Mead, 726 So.2d 865, 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); see generally Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
/817/so2d/1055 · .json · Public domain