Darr v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State · 477 So. 2d 553 - Hill v. State · Johnson v. Reynolds · Singleton v. State · 538 So. 2d 486 - Price v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is difficult, if not impossible, to understand the reasoning which leads to the conclusion that a person stands free of bias or prejudice who having voluntarily and emphatically asserted its existence in his mind, in the next moment under skillful questioning declares his freedom from its influence. By what sort of principle is it to be determined that the last statement of the man is better and more worthy of belief than the former?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pelham v. Walker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.