Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 817 So. 2d 40 - State v. Williams

817 So. 2d 40 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Boykin v. Alabama · Witherspoon v. Illinois · English v. State · State v. Bullock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jurisdiction of the trial court is divested and that of the appellate court attaches upon the entering of the order of appeal. Thereafter, the trial court has no jurisdiction to take any action except as otherwise provided by law and to: . . . . (2) Correct an error or deficiency in the record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a trial judge can correct an obvious ministerial error in order to have the record accurately reflect the proceedings in the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.