Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 817 So. 2d 57 - Walker v. STATE, DOTD

817 So. 2d 57 - Walker v. STATE, DOTD’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 23 U.S.C. § 409

Relies on Schweiker v. McClure · Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. · 421 So. 2d 216 - Leenerts Farms, Inc. v. Rogers · United States v. Kitchin · Commissioner v. Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. (b) A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly was associated had previously represented a client (1) whose interests are materially adverse to that person; and (2) about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter; unless the former client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing. (c) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter: (1) use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a client, or when the information has become generally known; or (2) reveal information relating to the representation except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a client.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “two matters are 'substantially related' when they are so interrelated both in fact and substance that a reasonable person would not be able to disassociate the two.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]his court has determined that the ethical rules which regulate attorneys' law practices have been recognized as having the force and effect of substantive law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.