Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 817 So. 2d 644 - Collins v. State

817 So. 2d 644 - Collins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Barker v. Wingo · Swain v. State of Alabama · United States v. Loud Hawk · 759 So. 2d 368 - Humphrey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every person convicted in this state of a felony who shall have been convicted twice previously of any felony or federal crime upon charges separately brought and arising out of separate incidents at different times and who shall have been sentenced to separate terms of one (1) year or more in any state and/or federal penal institution, whether in this state or elsewhere, shall be sentenced to the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed for such felony, and such sentence shall not be reduced or suspended nor shall such person be eligible for parole or probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Id. The videotape of the robbery did not show that the robber had a gun, and no gun was recovered during the police investigation. Id. This Court found that the teller's testimony was sufficient to establish the element of exhibition of a deadly weapon because”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Some of the time the unspoken intangible may be the judge's perception of the [attorney] arising from past experience. The fact that the judge spoke about this on the record does not by itself cause us to find error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.