¶1Because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the Commission’s findings of fact, we affirm. Botner v. State, Dep’t of Admin. Div. of Ret., 438 So.2d 94, 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Division of Ret. v. Allen, 395 So.2d 1192, 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So.2d 454, 455-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
817 So. 2d 946
Disanto v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 22, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-05-22
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2006
1 state decisions
Relies on 368 So. 2d 454 - Kennedy v. Wiggins · Division of Retirement v. Allen · 438 So. 2d 94 - Botner v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-05-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →