State v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Harris (1994), State v. Middleton (1999)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Delaware v. Fensterer · Kentucky v. Stincer · United States v. Owens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]is mere speculation that the tape might be of assistance to him on appeal provides no basis for meaningful appellate review. [Citation omitted.] It is appellant’s responsibility to prepare a complete record on appeal. Assuming, arguendo, that the tape was relevant, appellant is not entitled to a new trial unless he attempts otherwise to obtain the substance of material omitted from the record by consulting the appropriate trial participants and then establishes prejudice as a result of the inability to present a complete record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mitchell“statements made by out-of-court declarants that explain subsequent police conduct are admissible , supplying relevant background and continuity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sallee“[i]t is [A]ppellant’s responsibility to prepare a complete record on appeal.” State v. Dunn, 817 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Mo. banc 1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.