State v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty Dollars · United States v. · 72 Wis. 2d 200 - State v. Rosen · 393 Pa. Super. 320 - Commonwealth v. One 1988 Ford Coupe Vin 1FABP41A9JF143651
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“CAFA requires that [w]ithin three days of the date of seizure, such seizure shall be reported by said officer to the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the seizure is effected or the attorney general; and the prosecuting attorney or attorney general shall, within five days after receiving notice of the seizure, file a petition for forfeiture.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims · State v. Hendrix
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.