Crespo v. Armontrout’s Empirical Analysis
818 F.2d 684 · 1987
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2014
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Townsend v. Sain · Sumner v. Mata · Miller v. Fenton · Connecticut v. Barrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'were so egregious that [they] fatally infected the entire trial, rendering it fundamentally unfair.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ashker v. Class
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.