Mulligan v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis
818 F.2d 746 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2006
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Caldwell v. Mississippi · Moore v. Kemp · Spivey v. Zant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“decided case upon which to pass a new law claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rutherford v. Crosby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.