Harris v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
818 F.3d 49 · 2016
Citation profile
29
cited by 29 later decisions
June 2024
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell v. Wolfish · Hudson v. Palmer · Turner v. Safley · Hudson v. McMillian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that a court is ordinarily obligated to afford a special solicitude to pro se litigants,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“particularly where motions for summary judgment are concerned,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“some degree of touching or probing of body cavities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.