Souratgar v. Fair’s Empirical Analysis
818 F.3d 72 · 2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from New York Southern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001 · 22 U.S.C. § 9007 · 42 U.S.C. § 11607
Relies on Fogerty Fantasy Inc · Precision Instrument Mfg Co v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co · Sims v. Blot · Rydder v. Rydder · M.E.S., Inc. v. Snell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The sparse legislative history of the [federal] provision reveals it was 'intended to provide an additional deterrent to wrongful international child removals and retentions.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. N.S. v. D.M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.