Swartz v. Schaub’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cange v. Stotler & Co. · Fry v. UAL Corp. · 231 Ill. App. 3d 602 - University of Chicago Hospitals v. United Parcel Service · 632 F. Supp. 1133 - Seaboard Seed Co. v. Bemis Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the advertising, offering for sale, sale, or distribution of any services and any property, tangible or intangible, real, personal or mixed, and any other article, commodity, or thing of value wherever situated, and shall include any trade or commerce directly or indirectly affecting the people of this State.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.