Espinosa v. DeVasto’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “shall not apply with respect to any claim filed by any claimant after the date specified in the notice published under paragraph (3)(B)(i) and such claim may be considered if— (I) the claimant did not receive notice of the appointment of the receiver in time to file such claim before such date; and (II) such claim is filed in time to permit payment of such claim. 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(5)(C).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Nyhan v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. · 863 F. Supp. 54 - Guglielmi v. Federal Deposit Insurance

2. “where a claimant has been properly notified [emphasis added] of the appointment of a federal insurer as receiver, 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(3)(B)-(C), and has nonetheless failed to initiate an administrative claim within the filing period, 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(3)(B)(i), the claimant necessarily forfeits any right to pursue a claim against the failed institution's assets in any court.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Palumbo v. Roberti · 839 F. Supp. 80 - Palumbo v. Roberti

3. “participation in the administrative claims review process is mandatory [emphasis added] for all parties asserting claims against a failed institution, regardless of whether the lawsuit to enforce a claim was initiated prior to the appointment of a receiver.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Palumbo v. Roberti