Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 818 FSUPP2D 667 - Mendez v. Radec Corp.

Mendez v. Radec Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of Elections · Henson v. Columbus Bank & Trust Co. · Blowers v. Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. · Murray v. Stuckey's Inc. · Serricchio v. Wachovia Securities, LLC

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no clear-cut rule concerning whether an opponent’s billing records are discoverable on a motion for attorney’s, fees. Cases can be found ruling both ways on that issue. The general principle underlying these divergent results seems to be that whether such information is discoverable depends on the nature of the objections raised to the fee request.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.