Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 818 FSUPP2D 940 - Baker v. Dolgencorp, Inc.

Baker v. Dolgencorp, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
October 2015
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216

Relies on Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. · Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize · Rushford v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. · Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, a National Banking Association v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership, Jack L. Wolgin, Jack L. Wolgin Associates, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Both General Partners of Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, and Jack L. Wolgin and Muriel Wolgin, Husband and Wife v. Nilsi, N v. Abohar Investments, N v. Khalid Y. Al-Marzook, Jassim Y. Al- Marzook, and Faisal Y. Al-Marzook. Appeal of Fab III Concrete Corporation. Fab III Concrete Corporation v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association · In Re the Knight Publishing Company D/B/A the Charlotte Observer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mere interest in maintaining the privacy of the terms of settlement does not constitute a countervailing interest sufficient to rebut the presumption of public access to judicial records, especially when parties are not required to resolve FLSA claims in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Second is the `private-public character’ of employee rights under the FLSA, whereby the public has an `independent interest in assuring that employees wages are fair and thus do not endanger the national health and well-being.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is undisputed that an FLSA settlement agreement, submitted to a court for judicial approval, is a judicial record that triggers the common law right of public access.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.