Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 818 P.2d 1023 - Van Dyke v. Chappell

Van Dyke v. Chappell’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Homer v. Smith (1993), Ault v. Holden (2002)

28 state decisions

1601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scharf v. BMG Corp. · State v. Verde · Malan v. Lewis · Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. Finlinson · Staker v. Ainsworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““we look to the impact retroactive application would have on those affected. When we conclude that there has been justifiable reliance on the prior state of the law or that the retroactive application of the new law may otherwise create an undue burden, the court may order that a decision apply only prospectively.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Thhe retroactive operation of a change in the common law is not invariable and is not a question of judicial power; rather, whether a decision will operate prospectively should depend solely upon an appraisal of the relevant judicial policies to be advanced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[if such an approach were followed, any decision that modified in any way a previously articulated legal standard would have to be prospective only, making prospective application the rule rather than the exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.