Rands v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Santobello v. New York · Harris v. New York · Kercheval v. United States · United States v. Leon Guerrero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘First, the record must be clear as to the incident which is alleged as error. Second, the party claiming that the error amounted to plain error must demonstrate that a clear and unequivocal rule of law was violated. Finally, that party must prove that a substantial right has been denied him and as a result he has been materially prejudiced.’ ” Ramos v. State, 806 P.2d 822, 827 (Wyo.1991) (quoting Bradley [v. State], 635 P.2d [1161,] 1164 [Wyo.1981]).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Warhawk v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.