State v. Dastrup’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the approach recently taken by the Utah Supreme Court ... to require that all of the elements of [rule 11(5)] be expressly addressed in the plea colloquy, without regard to whether they are present in the affidavit.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Maguire

2. “Although the better approach may be to consider the colloquy and the affidavit in unison ..., the supreme court has precluded ... such an approach.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Maguire

3. “now requires rote recitation of all of the Rule 11 elements in the colloquy, without regard to whether they are specified in the affidavit,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Maguire