Day v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Solem v. Helm · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · 671 So. 2d 581 - Walker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This totality of circumstances must be considered in conjunction with the “strong but rebuttable presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within a broad range of reasonable professional assistance.” The presumption is overcome if the defendant demonstrates “that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” “In addition to the presumption that counsel’s conduct is reasonably professional, there is a presumption that counsel’s decisions are strategic in nature, rather than negligent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Graham v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.