Morrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 74 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wainwright v. Witt · Tibbs v. Florida · Oregon v. Elstad · Adams v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court does not err in failing to conduct a Nelson inquiry where the defendant merely expresses dissatisfaction with his attorney.... A lack of communication is not a ground for an incompetency claim.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“be formed in a moment and need only exist `for such a time as will allow the accused to be conscious of the nature of the act he is about to commit and the probable result of that act.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless the evidence is such that no view which the jury may lawfully take of it favorable to the opposite party can be sustained under the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.