Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 818 So. 2d 460 - Fuchs v. Robbins

818 So. 2d 460 - Fuchs v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 434 So. 2d 883 - Florida Bar · State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of Equalizers · 416 So. 2d 455 - Department of Educ. v. Lewis · 138 So. 2d 505 - Kaulakis v. Boyd · 70 So. 2d 347 - Barr v. Watts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his statutory prohibition of constitutional challenges by property appraisers is in accord with the general common law principle denying ministerial officers the power to challenge the constitutionality of statutes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The initial question presented is whether, in an action filed by a property appraiser seeking review of an adverse decision of the VAB which has overturned the appraiser's ad valorem tax assessment on a subject property, the appraiser may, within an appeal pursuant to section 194.036, Florida Statutes (1997), challenge the validity of a statute on the basis that such statute is contrary to limitations imposed by the United States Constitution or the Florida Constitution. We conclude that an appraiser may not, in that context, challenge the constitutionality of an applicable valuation statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ministerial officers must obey it, until in a proper proceeding its constitutionality is judicially passed upon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.