818 So. 2d 485 - State v. Seraphin’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

cited by 13 later decisions

states following

February 2009

most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 750 So. 2d 592 - Wood v. State · 756 So. 2d 42 - Peart v. State · 511 So. 2d 960 - State v. Ginebra · 705 So. 2d 1059 - Peart v. State · 536 So. 2d 992 - In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service sought to deport him, and served him with a notice to appear. A copy of the notice, which listed his conviction as grounds for deportation, was attached to his motion, as well as a transcript of his plea colloquy. The transcript reflected that immigration consequences had not been discussed at that hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Alfaro v. State
“defendant threatened with deportation [e.s.] must demonstrate that he or she was prejudiced in the process by entering the plea because the trial court failed to provide the information required by rule 3.172(c)(8).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 895 So. 2d 441 - Green v. State
“he or she would not have entered the plea”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 846 So. 2d 613 - Mongo v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.