Willis v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 322 So. 2d 22 - Dinkel v. Dinkel · 763 So. 2d 410 - Jacoby v. Jacoby · Farrow v. Farrow · Packard v. Packard · State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Hicks v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the trial court to consider a parent's conduct on the issue of custody, the evidence must show a direct impact on the child. The possibility of a negative impact is not sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the trial court should focus on whether the parent's conduct has had or is reasonably likely to have an adverse impact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.