Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 818 SO2D 683 - Peterson v. Peterson

Peterson v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Segall v. Segall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “make sufficient findings of fact for this Court to review the appropriateness of the alimony award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.