¶1Affirmed. See Nicarry v. State, 795 So.2d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that “the breaking into a building or structure for the purpose of continuing an offense in progress [such as fleeing and eluding] is sufficient to establish burglary.”).
818 So. 2d 684
Sanchez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 12, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-06-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2006
1 state decisions
Relies on 795 So. 2d 1114 - Nicarry v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-06-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →