State v. Rosenbaum’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Muller (1992), Rodarte v. State (1993)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. State · Walker v. Harrison · Houston Belt & Terminal v. Lynch · Jones v. State · Joachim v. Chambers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The State is entitled to appeal an order of a court in a criminal case if the order: (1) dismisses an indictment, information, or complaint or any portion of an indictment, information, or complaintf.] ****** (d) The prosecuting attorney may not make an appeal under Subsection (a) or (b) of this article later than the 15th day after the date on which the order, ruling, or sentence to be appealed is entered by the court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Taking into account both the terms “entered” and “court” in the phrase “entered by the court” in Art. 44.01(d), our reading of this phrase in the context of the statute as a whole leads to an interpretation that in this case the term “entered by the court” encompasses the signing of an order by the trial judge. * * * * * * Thus, a timetable based on the date of signature is a logical interpretation of Art. 44.01(d). Establishing a definite starting date for calculating appellate timetables serves the interests of all parties. We therefore find no conflict between Art. 44.01(d), Y.A.C.C.P., and TEX.R.APP.PROC. 41(b)(1) (amended 1989).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“As a practical matter, a judge may never really know when a signed order, judgment, or ruling is physically entered into the record.” So to clarify the unambiguous words of the legislature, the Rosenbaum opinion contorted the definition of a term or art, that is "entry of record,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Poe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.