Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

819 A.2d 320

Joyner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2003-03-13

Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017

1 district · 1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of appellant’s unopposed motion to reissue judgment, and appellant’s pro se motion to recall the mandate, it is

¶3ORDERED that appellant’s motion to reissue judgment is granted. The mandate issued on August 30, 2002 is hereby-recalled and the opinion and judgment of August 8, 2002, hereby vacated, to be reissued this date. It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s pro se motion to recall the mandate is denied as moot.

/819/a2d/320 · .json · Public domain