Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

819 F.2d 1137

Docket No. 87-7511.

Carr v. Hedricks

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 31, 1987. Decided May 26, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Blunt v. Dantes

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

David Lee Carr, appellant pro se.

Gayle Denise Holder, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Carr v. Hedricks, C/A No. 86-480 (N.D.W.Va., Jan. 7, 1987).

¶2

DISMISSED.

/819/f2d/1137 · .json · Public domain