Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 819 F.2d 12 - Paul Peter Pasterczyk v. Michael v. Fair

Paul Peter Pasterczyk v. Michael v. Fair’s Empirical Analysis

819 F.2d 12 · 1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
July 2009
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2009

11 federal appellate · 8 district ·

100198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Martinez v. California · Goldsboro Christian Schools, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he plaintiff was unable to rely on a certain theory of the case or to seek a certain remedy or form of relief in the first action because of the limitations on the subject matter jurisdiction of the courts or restrictions on their authority to entertain multiple theories or demands for multiple remedies or forms of relief in a single action, and the plaintiff desires in the second action to rely on that theory or to seek that remedy or form of relief....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if a jurisdictional obstacle has precluded raising that issue in the first action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.